Original ArticleIndian Journal of Pharmacy PracticeVol. 19 | Issue 1 | pp. 61–69Open access
Drug Utilization Patterns and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery at a Tertiary Care Hospital
- 1,
- 1*,
- 1,
- 2,
- 2
- 1 Department of Pharmacology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Shivarathreeshwara Nagar, Bannimantap, Mysuru, Karnataka, INDIA.
- 2 Department of Surgery, JSS Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, INDIA.
Published in Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Correspondence: Jayanthi Mallappa Kumar
Department of Pharmacology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Shivarathreeshwara Nagar, Bannimantap, Mysuru, Karnataka, INDIA.
Email: mkjayanthi@jssuni.edu.in
- Received:
- Feb 24, 2025
- Accepted:
- Jul 16, 2025
- DOI:
- 10.5530/ijopp.20260412
How to cite
Konnur, R., Kumar, J. M., Singanahalli, P. S., Choudhury, S., & Gangadhar, M. Drug Utilization Patterns and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 19(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijopp.20260412
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the patterns of medication usage and evaluates the pharmacoeconomic implications of drugs administered during abdominal surgeries in a tertiary care hospital setting. Particular emphasis is placed on two primary therapeutic categories: analgesics and Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs). Understanding these patterns aids in optimizing pharmacological decisions and curbing unnecessary healthcare expenditures. Objectives: To assess drug utilization trends and conduct a pharmacoeconomic evaluation among patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 110 patients receiving perioperative care. Data were extracted from inpatient case records to analyze demographics, prescribing patterns, dosage regimens, duration of therapy, and comparative drug costs. A Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) was utilized to evaluate price variations between hospital-supplied drugs and other commercially available brands. Results: Diclofenac (48.18%) and tramadol (47.27%) were the most prescribed analgesics, while pantoprazole (46.36%) was the leading PPI. Substantial price differences were observed, particularly for Inj. Paracetamol 1 g (236.77% cost variation). These discrepancies suggest significant opportunities for reducing costs through rational prescribing and promoting generic alternatives. Conclusion: Rational and cost-conscious drug prescribing is essential for improving patient outcomes and minimizing financial burden. Encouraging the use of generics, enforcing pricing transparency, and implementing evidence-based prescription protocols can significantly enhance affordability and care quality in perioperative settings.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Drug Utilization Patterns and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery at a Tertiary Care Hospital |
|---|---|
| Authors | Raghavendra Konnur; Jayanthi Mallappa Kumar; Pankaja Shivaramu Singanahalli; Saddique Choudhury; Manu Gangadhar |
| Affiliations | Department of Pharmacology, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Shivarathreeshwara Nagar, Bannimantap, Mysuru, Karnataka, INDIA.; Department of Surgery, JSS Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | mkjayanthi@jssuni.edu.in |
| Journal | Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 19, Issue 1 |
Also in this issue
- Drug Prescribing and Global Comparison of Drug Categorization in Pregnancypp. 1–6
- Effects of High Haemoglobin Levels in Pregnancy and their Complications on Maternal and Foetal Outcomespp. 7–12
- Breast Cancer Diagnosis Reimagined: The Rise of Biopsy 2.0 and Artificial Intelligence-A Reviewpp. 13–19
- Oral Microbiome Transplantation: A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Restoring Oral and Systemic Healthpp. 20–25
- Exploring Semaglutide Effects on Osteoarthritis in Obesity: Emphasis on Weight Management and Inflammatory Responsespp. 26–31