Research ArticleIndian Journal of Pharmacy PracticeVol. 9 | Issue 2 | pp. 123–130Open access
Comparative Drug Utilization of Antimicrobial Agents in Medical and Respiratory Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India
- 1,
- 1*,
- 2,
- 1
- 1 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Karavali College of Pharmacy, Mangalore-575 028, INDIA.
- 2 Department of Pharmacology, Father Muller Medical College Hospital, Mangalore-575 002, INDIA.
Published in Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Correspondence: B Sajeev Kumar
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Karavali College of Pharmacy, Mangalore-575 028, INDIA.
Email: bsajeev2001@yahoo.com
- DOI:
- 10.5530/ijopp.9.2.11
How to cite
Benjamin, B., Kumar, B. S., Udaykumar, P., & Swamy, V. N. Comparative Drug Utilization of Antimicrobial Agents in Medical and Respiratory Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 9(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijopp.9.2.11
Abstract
Introduction : Drug Utilization Evaluation play a key role in managing healthcare system to understand, interpret, evaluate and improve the prescribing, administration and use of medications. Objective: To evaluate and compare the drug utilization of antimicrobials in Medical and Respiratory Intensive Care Units so as to include restriction policies. Methods: A prospective, observational study was performed on 209 prescriptions. The total number of drugs, dose, route, sensitivity pattern and cost were collected from in-patient records. The Defined Daily Dose/100 bed days of the most frequently prescribed antimicrobials was also calculated. Results: Out of the 1046 drugs prescribed in the Medical Intensive Care Unit, 167 antimicrobials were prescribed with an average of 2 drugs per prescription. The average length of stay was 4 (±1.4) days. Frequently prescribed antimicrobials were ceftriaxone, amikacin and clindamycin. The DDD/100 bed days for those drugs was 22.2, 6.9 and 5.9 respectively. The widely prescribed combinations were piperacillin+tazobactam and cefoperazone+tazobactam. In only 23% of the cases sensitivity test was performed. The most prevailing organisms were E.Coli (53%) and Acinetobacter sps (23%). Colistin and meropenam were the most sensitive antimicrobials for most microorganisms. In Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, out of 1024 drugs, 163 antimicrobials were prescribed with an average of 2 drugs per prescription. The average length of stay was 4 (±1.4) days. Ceftriaxone (40%) was found to be most commonly prescribed drug followed by clindamycin (17%), levofloxacin (12%) and meropenam (11%). The generally prescribed combination was piperacillin+tazobactam (30%). The DDD/100 bed days was found to be high. In only 20% of the cases sensitivity test was performed. Acinetobacter sps was the most frequently isolated pathogen and all microorganisms were sensitive to colistin. Conclusion: There is a need of anti-microbial agents usage guidelines and restriction policies for the rational prescribing of antimicrobials in critically ill patients.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Comparative Drug Utilization of Antimicrobial Agents in Medical and Respiratory Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bincy Benjamin; B Sajeev Kumar; Padmaja Udaykumar; V.B. Narayana Swamy |
| Affiliations | Department of Pharmacy Practice, Karavali College of Pharmacy, Mangalore-575 028, INDIA.; Department of Pharmacology, Father Muller Medical College Hospital, Mangalore-575 002, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | bsajeev2001@yahoo.com |
| Journal | Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 9, Issue 2 |
Also in this issue
- Editorialpp. 65
- Sustainable Development Goals and Addressing Noncommunicable Diseasespp. 66–72
- The Third Sustainable Development Goal: End Epidemics and other Communicable Diseases; Indian Perspectivepp. 73–76
- Curtailing Unhealthy Consumption of Alcohol for Sustainable Development in India and South Africapp. 77–85
- Controlling the use of Tobacco for Sustainable Development: A Focus on India and South Africapp. 86–94