Website ReviewJournal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation StudiesVol. 4 | Issue 1 | pp. 115–120Open access
A Website Review of AD Scientific Index: Evaluating its Methodology, Applications, and Impact on Research Assessment
- 1,
- 2*,
- 3
- 1 A.R.G. College of Arts and Commerce, Davanagere, Karnataka, INDIA.
- 2 Manuscript Technomedia, No. 9, St. Thomas Town, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.
- 3 CMR University, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.
Published in Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies
Correspondence: Mueen Ahmed KK
Manuscript Technomedia, No. 9, St. Thomas Town, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.
Email: mueen.ahmed@gmail.com
- Received:
- Nov 28, 2024
- Accepted:
- Apr 2, 2025
- DOI:
- 10.5530/jcitation.20250169
How to cite
M, C. S., KK, M. A., & Bagalkoti, V. A Website Review of AD Scientific Index: Evaluating its Methodology, Applications, and Impact on Research Assessment. Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, 4(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.5530/jcitation.20250169
Abstract
The AD Scientific Index (Alper-Doger Scientific Index) is an emerging research evaluation tool that ranks individual researchers based on Google Scholar citation metrics. Unlike traditional scientometric tools such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar Metrics, it provides real-time updates, researcher mobility tracking, and six-year applications, advantages, and limitations of the AD Scientific Index in comparison with other major Scientometric tools. While the AD Scientific Index offers dynamic and transparent ranking. Its heavy reliance on Google Scholar raises concerns about citation inflation, non-peer-reviewed content inclusion, self-citation manipulation, and lack of field normalization. Researchers in highly cited fields tend to dominate rankings, while disciplines with lower citation averages are underrepresented. Despite these limitations, the AD Scientific Index serves as a valuable supplementary tool for evaluating individual research impact. However, for a comprehensive assessment, it should be used alongside established scientometric databases like Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that while the AD Scientific Index enhances researcher visibility, its ranking should be interpreted cautiously, with a focus on quality over quantity in research evaluation.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | A Website Review of AD Scientific Index: Evaluating its Methodology, Applications, and Impact on Research Assessment |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chaman Sab M; Mueen Ahmed KK; Vitthal Bagalkoti |
| Affiliations | A.R.G. College of Arts and Commerce, Davanagere, Karnataka, INDIA.; Manuscript Technomedia, No. 9, St. Thomas Town, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA.; CMR University, Bangalore, Karnataka, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | mueen.ahmed@gmail.com |
| Journal | Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 4, Issue 1 |
Also in this issue
- How Generative AI Can Boost Scientific Research: Exploring its Uses, Challenges, and What’s Next ?pp. 1–8
- Scientific Mapping of Research Evolution on Buddhist Philosophy: A Bibliometric Analysispp. 9–19
- Impact of Social Media on Information Dissemination and Public Perception during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scientometric Analysispp. 20–26
- Assessing Research Impact in Indian Conference Proceedings: Insights from Collaboration and Citationspp. 27–35
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Parental Management and Learning Achievement: Global Perspectives and Future Directionspp. 36–46