Original ArticleInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical InvestigationVol. 16 | Issue 1 | 2026 | pp. 241–251Open access
Utilization of NCCMERP Index to Assess and Categorize Medication Discrepancies among Pediatric Patients: A Hospital Based Epileptic Cohort Study
- 1,
- 1*,
- 1,
- 1,
- 1,
- 1
- 1 Department of Pharmacy Practice KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA.
Published in International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
Correspondence: Shashikala Chanmallappa Wali
Department of Pharmacy Practice KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA.
Email: shashikalawali@klepharm.edu
Copyright: © 2026 Manuscript Technomedia. This is an open access article.
- Published:
- Jan 1, 2026
- Received:
- May 14, 2025
- Accepted:
- Sep 3, 2025
- DOI:
- 10.5530/ijpi.20260387
How to cite
Patil, V. N., Wali, S. C., Gudhoor, M., Kini, P. N., Ganachari, M. S., & Byakod, V. R. (2026). Utilization of NCCMERP Index to Assess and Categorize Medication Discrepancies among Pediatric Patients: A Hospital Based Epileptic Cohort Study. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 16(1), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20260387
Abstract
Background
Recurrent seizures characterize epilepsy, affecting 50 million globally, with 12 million in India. Prevalence rates in North India are 6.99 per 1,000 in rural areas and 5.48 in urban areas. Medication errors pose significant risks, necessitating improved pediatric medication reconciliation to enhance treatment outcomes
Objectives
This study aimed to assess medication discrepancies and their severity using the NCCMERP scale in pediatric patients with epilepsy.
Materials and Methods
The study aimed to identify and assess the severity of medication discrepancies in a cohort of 110 pediatric epilepsy patients at a tertiary care hospital, and then intervene to address the discrepancies.
Results
This study screened 247 pediatric epilepsy patients, recruiting 123 eligible participants, with 110 completing a follow-up. Findings revealed a male predominance (70.90%) and diverse socio-economic backgrounds. Common medication discrepancies included drug omissions 38(46.9%) and non-adherence 16(19.73%), emphasizing the need for improved management strategies to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes in pediatric epilepsy care.
Conclusion
Study identifies key challenges in pediatric epilepsy management, highlighting the need for tailored treatment approaches, improved medication adherence, and enhanced communication among healthcare providers and increased parental involvement for better outcomes.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Utilization of NCCMERP Index to Assess and Categorize Medication Discrepancies among Pediatric Patients: A Hospital Based Epileptic Cohort Study |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vivek Nilkanth Patil; Shashikala Chanmallappa Wali; Manjula Gudhoor; Pratiksha N Kini; Madiwalayya Shivakantayya Ganachari; Vishwa Rajakumar Byakod |
| Affiliations | Department of Pharmacy Practice KLE College of Pharmacy, Belagavi, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KAHER), Belagavi, Karnataka, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | shashikalawali@klepharm.edu |
| Journal | International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 16, Issue 1 (2026) |
Also in this issue
- Anti-Parkinson Drug Levodopa: It's Novel Delivery Systems, Preclinical and Clinical Studies: A Reviewpp. 1–11
- Shifting Regulatory Frameworks for Nanomedicine in the Evolution of Personalized Medicinepp. 12–22
- A Global Perspective on Navigating the Regulatory Landscape of Adaptive AI in Healthcare: Balancing Innovation and Patient Safetypp. 23–29
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Drug Therapy Optimization on Drug Related Problems Amongst Older Adult Patients: A Systematic Reviewpp. 30–42
- The Empowerment of Drugs Inspectors Under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940-A Review of Implementation of Power of Arrest Conferred by Hon’ble Supreme Court of Indiapp. 43–50