Original ArticlePharmacognosy CommunicationsVol. 14 | Issue 3 | pp. 115–120Open access
An Assessment of the Antibacterial Activities, Phytochemistry and Toxicities of Nigella damascena L. Seed Extracts
- 1,
- 1,
- 1,
- 1,
- 2,
- 1*
- 1 School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, AUSTRALIA.
- 2 School of Environment and Science, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
Published in Pharmacognosy Communications
Correspondence: Matthew James Cheesman
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, AUSTRALIA.
Email: m.cheesman@griffith.edu.au
- Received:
- Mar 14, 2024
- Accepted:
- Jun 10, 2024
- DOI:
- 10.5530/pc.2024.3.18
How to cite
Kim, J., Rusford, E. J., Tiwana, G., Alcorn, S. R., Cock, I. E., & Cheesman, M. J. An Assessment of the Antibacterial Activities, Phytochemistry and Toxicities of Nigella damascena L. Seed Extracts. Pharmacognosy Communications, 14(3), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2024.3.18
Abstract
Background: Nigella damascena L. (ND) seeds have been incorporated into traditional plant-based medicinal systems for millennia. However, there are conflicting reports on the antibacterial activities of the seed extracts, although phytochemicals known to possess antibacterial activity have been found in the seeds of this species. The toxicities of the extracts have not been studied previously. Aim: This work assesses the ability for aqueous and methanolic ND seed extracts to inhibit the growth of a panel of skin pathogens on agar and in broth, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Qualitative determinations of the phytochemical constituents of the extracts were performed, as well as their toxicity levels. Materials and Methods: Bacterial growth inhibition was evaluated using agar disc diffusion and liquid broth microdilution assays, whilst Artemia nauplii bioassays were used to screen toxicities. Qualitative phytochemical assays were conducted to assess the relative abundance of several important phytochemical compound classes. Results: No inhibition was observed on agar for either the aqueous or methanolic extracts against S. aureus, MRSA, S. epidermidis or S. pyogenes. This was concordant with the liquid microdilution broth assays, with the exception of the methanolic ND extract against S. pyogenes, which produced a minimum inhibitory concentration value of 481 μg/mL. Phenols, saponins, tannins and alkaloid were present in both extract types, while flavonoids could be detected in the methanolic extract only. Both extracts were deemed to be nontoxic in the Artemia nauplii assay. Conclusion: The ND methanolic extract possessed activity against S. pyogenes in liquid broth, but not on agar. The presence of flavonoids in this extract may be responsible for this activity. The extracts were inactive against S. aureus, MRSA and S. epidermidis in agar and broth assays, and were also nontoxic as adjudged by the Artemia nauplii brine shrimp assays.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | An Assessment of the Antibacterial Activities, Phytochemistry and Toxicities of Nigella damascena L. Seed Extracts |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jinwoo Kim; Enoch John Rusford; Gagan Tiwana; Sean Robert Alcorn; Ian Edwin Cock; Matthew James Cheesman |
| Affiliations | School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Gold Coast, AUSTRALIA.; School of Environment and Science, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Brisbane, AUSTRALIA. |
| Corresponding author | m.cheesman@griffith.edu.au |
| Journal | Pharmacognosy Communications |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 14, Issue 3 |
Also in this issue
- Editorialpp. 91
- Upcoming Eventspp. 136
- Medicinal Plant Imagespp. 134–135
- Finely Ground Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze leaves (Matcha) Inhibits Porphyromonas gingivalis Growth and therefore may be Useful to Control Periodontitispp. 131–133
- Eucalyptus major (Maiden) Blakely and Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden and Betche) Cheel Leaf Solutions Inhibit the Growth of Antibiotic-Sensitive and β-Lactam Resistant Bacterial Pathogenspp. 121–130