Original ArticlePharmacognosy CommunicationsVol. 14 | Issue 3 | pp. 92–101Open access
Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Profiles of Selected Medicinal Plant Extracts and Conventional Antibiotics against Bacterial Triggers of Some Autoimmune Diseases
- 1,
- 1,2*
- 1 School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
- 2 Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Published in Pharmacognosy Communications
Correspondence: Ian Edwin Cock
School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.; Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.
Email: i.cock@griffith.edu.au
- Received:
- Mar 4, 2024
- Accepted:
- May 9, 2024
- DOI:
- 10.5530/pc.2024.3.16
How to cite
Cocis, A., & Cock, I. E. Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Profiles of Selected Medicinal Plant Extracts and Conventional Antibiotics against Bacterial Triggers of Some Autoimmune Diseases. Pharmacognosy Communications, 14(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5530/pc.2024.3.16
Abstract
Background: Nigella sativa L., Anongessius latifolia (Roxb. ex DC.) Wall. ex Euill. and Perr. and shilajit have been used traditionally to treat numerous infectious diseases, including many caused by bacterial pathogens. However, extracts of these traditionally medicines have been poorly studied and are yet to be tested for the ability to inhibit the growth of bacterial triggers of multiple sclerosis and rheumatic fever. Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial activity of selected plant extracts was assessed using disc diffusion and liquid dilution minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays against some bacterial triggers of multiple sclerosis and rheumatic fever. Interactions between the extracts and conventional antibiotics were studied and classified using the sum of the fractional inhibitory concentration (ΣFIC). The toxicity of the individual samples and the combinations was assessed using the artemia lethality assay (ALA) assay. Results: The methanolic A. latifolia extract displayed notable antibacterial activity against the bacterial triggers of multiple sclerosis (A. baylyi and P. aeruginosa), and rheumatic fever (S. pyogenes). Furthermore, combining the methanolic A. latifolia extract with tetracycline and chloramphenicol resulted in potentiation of the inhibitory activity against P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes. None of the individual components (nor the combinations) were toxic in the ALA assay. Conclusion: The A. latifolia methanolic displayed clinically relevant antibacterial activity against A. baylyi, P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes when tested alone. Furthermore, that extract also potentiated the activity of tetracycline and chloramphenicol against some bacteria. The lack of toxicity of the extracts and combinations indicates that these combinations may provide leads in the development of new therapies to prevent and treat the autoimmune diseases multiple sclerosis and rheumatic fever.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Antibacterial Activity and Toxicity Profiles of Selected Medicinal Plant Extracts and Conventional Antibiotics against Bacterial Triggers of Some Autoimmune Diseases |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amadeus Cocis; Ian Edwin Cock |
| Affiliations | School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, AUSTRALIA.; Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, AUSTRALIA. |
| Corresponding author | i.cock@griffith.edu.au |
| Journal | Pharmacognosy Communications |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 14, Issue 3 |
Also in this issue
- Editorialpp. 91
- Upcoming Eventspp. 136
- Medicinal Plant Imagespp. 134–135
- Finely Ground Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze leaves (Matcha) Inhibits Porphyromonas gingivalis Growth and therefore may be Useful to Control Periodontitispp. 131–133
- Eucalyptus major (Maiden) Blakely and Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden and Betche) Cheel Leaf Solutions Inhibit the Growth of Antibiotic-Sensitive and β-Lactam Resistant Bacterial Pathogenspp. 121–130