Original ArticleInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical InvestigationVol. 16 | Issue 3 | 2026 | pp. 1090–1097Open access
Medical Device Regulation in India: Comparative Stakeholder Analysis and Policy Recommendations for CDSCO
- 1*,
- 2
- 1 School of Pharmacy, Gujarat Technological University, Gandhinagar Campus, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, INDIA.
- 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs, Gujarat Technological University, Chandkheda Campus, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA.
Published in International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
Correspondence: Dasharath Muljibhai Patel
School of Pharmacy, Gujarat Technological University, Gandhinagar Campus, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, INDIA.
Email: drdmpatel1971@gmail.com
Copyright: © 2026 Manuscript Technomedia. This is an open access article.
- Published:
- Jan 1, 2026
- Received:
- Jan 29, 2026
- Accepted:
- May 5, 2026
- DOI:
- 10.5530/ijpi.20260127
How to cite
Patel, D. M., & Pandey, S. V. (2026). Medical Device Regulation in India: Comparative Stakeholder Analysis and Policy Recommendations for CDSCO. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 16(3), 1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.20260127
Abstract
Objectives
India's rapidly growing medical device industry, which is expected to rank among the biggest in the world in the next ten years, is heavily regulated by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). Significant obstacles are still being reported by stakeholders in a variety of roles and geographical areas, even after significant regulatory advancements were made in 2017 with the implementation of the Medical Device Regulations (MDR).
Materials and Methods
To find statistically significant gaps, SPSS-based tests such as ANOVA, Chi-square, and Pearson correlation were performed.
Results
In comparison to international benchmarks (FDA 4.1, EU MDR 4.3), a national average of 2.9 was found using a Regulatory Satisfaction Index (RSI). The findings showed gaps in knowledge depending on roles and zonal imbalances. Classification clarity and registration success were shown to be strongly correlated (r=0.72, p<0.001). The model which includes risk-based classification, electronic submissions, feedback mechanisms, integrated surveillance, national training, and enforcement (REFINE) is proposed in this study as a solution to these issues.
Conclusion
These suggestions may be to improve compliance, simplify India's regulatory framework, and solidify its place in the world of medical technology. The results provide CDSCO and stakeholders with a useful, evidence-based policy roadmap.
Keywords
Subject
Article metadata
| Title | Medical Device Regulation in India: Comparative Stakeholder Analysis and Policy Recommendations for CDSCO |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dasharath Muljibhai Patel; Shipra Vijayesh Pandey |
| Affiliations | School of Pharmacy, Gujarat Technological University, Gandhinagar Campus, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, INDIA.; Department of Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs, Gujarat Technological University, Chandkheda Campus, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA. |
| Corresponding author | drdmpatel1971@gmail.com |
| Journal | International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation |
| Volume / Issue | Vol. 16, Issue 3 (2026) |
Also in this issue
- Exploring Natural Bioactive Compounds for Radiation Countermeasure Properties: A Reviewpp. 770–778
- Exploring the Historical Dissemination and Contemporary Resurgence of Monkeypox: A Comprehensive Examination of its Evolution, Global Impact, and Treatment Approachespp. 779–787
- Engineering Smart Stimuli-Responsive Carriers for Precision Drug Delivery: Current Trends and Future Outlookpp. 788–799
- From Seizure Control to Parasite Management: Antiepileptic Drugs and Neurocysticercosispp. 800–807
- Preclinical Models of Hepatic Injury: A Comprehensive Review of Chemically, Immunologically, and Pharmacologically Induced Liver Damage in Rat Modelspp. 808–825